Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
Corey Mayfield Jr.
CB • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Forney, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Corey Mayfield Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.2
Consistency
37.1
Season Value
30
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA
1819202021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Mayfield Jr., CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA. Corey Mayfield Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UTSA paired 22 primary output with 35.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
35.2
Usage
6.8
Consistency
37.1
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 3. Houston: 1. Army: 0. Texas: 1. Unknown: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Western Kentucky: 2. Florida International: 2. North Texas: 4. UAB: 5. Louisiana Tech: 1. Rice: 3. UTEP: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 4 by 46.7. Houston: 6 by 35. Army: 3 by 12.5. Texas: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 6 by 45. Florida International: 5 by 40.8. North Texas: 4 by 56.7. UAB: 4 by 66.7. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5. Rice: 4 by 46.7. UTEP: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=9 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · n=3 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half2.5 · n=6 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ TroySplash game | L 12-18 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ RiceSplash game | W 41-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UABSplash game | W 44-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 31-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida InternationalSplash game | W 30-10 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Texas | L 20-41 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army | W 41-38 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202020202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 7.4 | 1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 16.2 | 3.1 | 4 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 11 | 21.7 | 4.6 | 6 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 21.7 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 9 | 17.4 | 4.7 | -2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 17.4 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 22 | 35.2 | 6.8 | 13 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 22 | 35.2 | 6.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53 takeover score.
#4
Army
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.1 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UTSA
22 primary output · 35.2 efficiency · 6.8 usage
30
#2
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
30
22 primary · 35.2 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · UTSA
24.9
11 primary · 21.7 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8276
North Forney · Forney, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
159
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.