Usage / Role
52%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Usage / Role
52%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
73
High-end production for a back
Reliability
62
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
77
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Brenden Brady built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a running back from Cibolo, TX wearing No. 5, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Brenden Brady's career was his backfield work: 1,738...
Read the storyBrenden Brady, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · UTSA. Brenden Brady leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 265 | 221 | 44 | 1 | 42.7 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 386 | 271 | 115 | 2 | 39.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 6 | 287 | 239 | 48 | 1 | 37.8 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 8 | 84 | 76 | 8 | 1 | 46.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 261 | 232 | 29 | 3 | 46.1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 889 | 699 | 190 | 10 | 70.6 |
Related Context
Brenden Brady played RB for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brenden Brady recorded 67 passing yards, 1,738 rushing yards, and 434 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2022 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTSA paired 889 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Win with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
74.1
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
22.5
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 27. Army: 78. Texas: 85. Texas Southern: 64. Middle Tennessee: 135. Western Kentucky: 133. Florida International: 58. North Texas: 112. UAB: 53. Louisiana Tech: 68. Rice: 67. UTEP: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 8 by 25.5. Army: 20 by 41.3. Texas: 23 by 36.2. Texas Southern: 16 by 38.5. Middle Tennessee: 22 by 57.8. Western Kentucky: 23 by 51.1. Florida International: 9 by 43.8. North Texas: 19 by 61.4. UAB: 14 by 39.4. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 69.7. Rice: 6 by 96.5. UTEP: 4 by 23.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
96.5 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 6 | 67 | 11.20 | 0 | — | — | 11.2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech2+ TD | W 51-7 | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 14 | 53 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-27 | 19 | 112 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 7 | 19 | 2.70 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 5.8 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 19 | 98 | 5.20 | 1 | 3 | 37 | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Texas Southern | W 52-24 | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Texas | L 20-41 | 21 | 70 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army2+ TD | W 41-38 | 19 | 76 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3.4 |
Player Story
Brenden Brady built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a running back from Cibolo, TX wearing No. 5, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Brenden Brady's career was his backfield work: 1,738 rushing yards, 385 carries, 17 rushing touchdowns, and 434 receiving yards across 46 career games in the available record. His career also includes 67 passing yards, 434 receiving yards, and 2 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Brenden Brady's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 265 | 42.6 | 16.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 386 | 42.6 | 11.5 | 121 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 287 | 41.8 | 14.4 | -99 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 58 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 345 | 48.1 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 889 | 48.7 | 22.5 | 544 |
#1 Featured game
vs North Texas
Week 13 · L 21-24 · Conference game
Loss with 97 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
97
Scrimmage Yards
84.1 takeover
97 scrimmage yards and 24 usage.
#2
vs UTEP
Week 11 · W 52-21 · Conference game
150
Scrimmage Yards
84 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
150 scrimmage yards and 41.8 usage.
#3
@ San Diego State
Week 1 · L 24-38 · Postseason
84
Scrimmage Yards
83.4 takeover
Loss with 84 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
84 scrimmage yards and 37 usage.
#4
vs Western Kentucky
Week 6 · W 31-28 · Conference game
133
Scrimmage Yards
81.6 takeover
Win with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
133 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#5
@ Middle Tennessee
Week 5 · W 45-30 · Conference game
135
Scrimmage Yards
81.3 takeover
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 30.1 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
889 primary output · 48.7 efficiency · 22.5 usage
70.6
#2
2021 Postseason · UTSA
46.1
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
46.1
345 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 14.2 usage
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.