Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2018-2023UTSA
Tykee Ogle-Kellogg
WR • 6'5" • 225 lbs • Alcoa, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tykee Ogle-Kellogg reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.6
Consistency
69.1
Season Value
65.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
181920212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tykee Ogle-Kellogg, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Tykee Ogle-Kellogg reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 575 primary output with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.2
Efficiency
82.6
Usage
12.1
Consistency
69.1
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 54. Houston: 16. Texas State: 78. Army: 46. Tennessee: 46. Temple: 83. UAB: 38. Florida Atlantic: 42. East Carolina: 85. North Texas: 6. Rice: 41. South Florida: 33. Tulane: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 3 by 100. Houston: 3 by 35.6. Texas State: 6 by 86.7. Army: 1 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. UAB: 3 by 84.4. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 5 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 20. Rice: 2 by 100. South Florida: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins51.1 · n=9 · +22.4 vs Losses
Losses28.8 · n=4 · -22.4 vs Wins
First Half51.6 · n=7 · +15.9 vs Second Half
Second Half35.7 · n=6 · -15.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Marshall | W 35-17 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 41 |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida | W 49-21 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina2+ TD | W 41-27 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 43 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 36-10 | — | 1 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 10/15 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Temple | W 49-34 | — | 3 | 83 | 27.7 | 27.70 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tennessee | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 43 |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Army | L 29-37 | — | 1 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Houston | L 14-17 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2018-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 179 | 69.7 | 9.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 57 | 55 | 10.4 | -122 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 169 | 77.8 | 15.3 | 112 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 158 | 76 | 8.7 | -11 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 158 | 76 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 220 | 58.9 | 9.4 | 62 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 220 | 58.9 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 575 | 82.6 | 12.1 | 355 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 575 | 82.6 | 12.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
575 primary output · 82.6 efficiency · 12.1 usage
65.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
65.9
575 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · UTSA
44.8
158 primary · 76 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8548
Alcoa · Alcoa, TN
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,358
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.