Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Southern Miss paired 9.5 primary output with 46.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 37.2 |
| 2019 Postseason | Southern Miss | 11 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 27.3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 11 | 28 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | 27.3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 10 | 91 | 8 | 0.5 | 1 | - | 0 | 71.7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 12 | 60 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 65 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2023 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 11 | 51 | 1 | 0.5 | 3 | - | 0 | 35.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Southern Miss paired 9.5 primary output with 46.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 24.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
24.3
Usage
6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alcorn State: 0. Tulane: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Texas State: 2. Old Dominion: 0. South Alabama: 1. App State: 0. UL Monroe: 1. Louisiana: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Troy: 1.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alcorn State: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas State: 5 by 20.8. Texas State: 6 by 45. Old Dominion: 7 by 29.2. South Alabama: 5 by 30.8. App State: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 1 by 14.2. Louisiana: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 11 by 45.8. Troy: 5 by 35.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.