Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2018-2023Michigan State
LB • 6'2" • 240 lbs • Metairie, LA, USA
Aaron Brule shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.9
Efficiency
35.1
Consistency
48.1
Season Value
29.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Brule, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Mississippi State. Aaron Brule shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Aaron Brule played LB for Mississippi State and Michigan State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Aaron Brule recorded 233 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 0 primary output with 2.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
11.9
Consistency
48.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 2. Unknown: 2.5. Washington: 0. Maryland: 1. Iowa: 1. Rutgers: 0. Michigan: 3. Minnesota: 0. Nebraska: 2. Ohio State: 1. Indiana: 1. Penn State: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 5 by 45.8. Washington: 2 by 8.3. Maryland: 7 by 39.2. Iowa: 1 by 14.2. Rutgers: 5 by 20.8. Michigan: 11 by 75.8. Minnesota: 3 by 12.5. Nebraska: 7 by 49.2. Ohio State: 7 by 39.2. Indiana: 8 by 43.3. Penn State: 5 by 40.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
75.8 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Penn State | L 0-42 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Indiana | W 24-21 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Ohio State | L 3-38 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Nebraska | W 20-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Minnesota | L 12-27 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Michigan10+ tackles · Splash game | L 0-49 | 11 | 8 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Rutgers | L 24-27 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Iowa | L 16-26 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Maryland | L 9-31 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Washington | L 7-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 0 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/1 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Michigan State
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Mississippi State | 0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Mississippi State | 2.5 | 11.8 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 2.5 | 11.8 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Mississippi State | 15 | 41.7 | 13.9 | 12.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 15 | 41.7 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 11 | 30.1 | 10.6 | -4 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan State | 11.5 | 24 | 6.8 | 0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan State | 15.5 | 35.1 | 11.9 | 4 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 69.3 takeover score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.8 takeover score.
#3
Rutgers
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Mississippi State
0 primary output · 2.1 efficiency · 0.4 usage
34.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Mississippi State
34.2
0 primary · 2.1 efficiency · 0.4 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Mississippi State
31.1
15 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 13.9 usage
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8816
Archbishop Rummel · Metairie, LA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
233
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.