Player Stats

Geor'quarius Spivey College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
298
Receptions
28
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 PostseasonMississippi State3113049.8
2019 Regular SeasonMississippi State3219049.8
2020 Regular SeasonMississippi State511121043.6
2021 Regular SeasonTCU339020.5
2022 PostseasonTCU9110058.6
2022 Regular SeasonTCU910126158.6
2023 Regular SeasonMississippi State0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

TCU paired 136 primary output with 69.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 69.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, TCU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · TCU

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

15.1

Efficiency

69.1

Usage

6.3

Consistency

44.2

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 10. Colorado: 20. Tarleton State: 23. SMU: 3. Kansas: 10. Kansas State: 16. Texas: 6. Iowa State: 43. Kansas State: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 66.7. Colorado: 1 by 100. Tarleton State: 1 by 100. SMU: 1 by 20. Kansas: 1 by 66.7. Kansas State: 1 by 100. Texas: 1 by 40. Iowa State: 3 by 95.6. Kansas State: 1 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins17.3 · Games = 7 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses7.5 · Games = 2 · -9.8 vs Wins