Usage Score
6.3
Player Dossier
2019-2023Mississippi State
Geor'quarius Spivey
TE • 6'5" • 240 lbs • Monroe, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Geor'quarius Spivey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.1
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
54.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · TCU
19192021222223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Mississippi State • TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Geor'quarius Spivey, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · TCU. Geor'quarius Spivey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
TCU paired 136 primary output with 69.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · TCU
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
15.1
Efficiency
69.1
Usage
6.3
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 10. Colorado: 20. Unknown: 23. SMU: 3. Kansas: 10. Kansas State: 16. Texas: 6. Iowa State: 43. Kansas State: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 66.7. Colorado: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. SMU: 1 by 20. Kansas: 1 by 66.7. Kansas State: 1 by 100. Texas: 1 by 40. Iowa State: 3 by 95.6. Kansas State: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.3 · Games = 6 · +8.8 vs Losses
Losses7.5 · Games = 2 · -8.8 vs Wins
First Half13.2 · Games = 5 · -4.3 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · Games = 4 · +4.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ Georgia | L 7-65 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Kansas State | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Iowa State | W 62-14 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Texas | W 17-10 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Kansas State | W 38-28 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Kansas | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ SMU | W 42-34 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Colorado | W 38-13 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2019-2023
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2019201920202021202220222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Mississippi State | 32 | 71.1 | 7.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 32 | 71.1 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 121 | 45.3 | 6.2 | 89 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 9 | 20 | 6.4 | -112 |
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 136 | 69.1 | 6.3 | 127 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 136 | 69.1 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | -136 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Primary metric
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa State
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
13
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
23
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · TCU
136 primary output · 69.1 efficiency · 6.3 usage
54.9
#2
2022 Regular Season · TCU
54.9
136 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Mississippi State
46
32 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8775
Richwood · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
298
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.