Usage Score
4.6
Player Dossier
2019-2023Auburn
LB • 6'6" • 271 lbs • Rumson, NJ, USA
Elijah McAllister shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.6
Efficiency
14.4
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
14.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Elijah McAllister, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Vanderbilt. Elijah McAllister shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Elijah McAllister played LB for Vanderbilt and Auburn. Across 5 tracked seasons, Elijah McAllister recorded 93 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Auburn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 8 primary output with 17.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 14.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
14.4
Usage
4.6
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 1. Massachusetts: 2. California: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Texas A&M: 1. Georgia: 0. LSU: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Arkansas: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Alabama: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 1 by 14.2. Massachusetts: 2 by 28.3. California: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 1 by 9.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 18.3. Georgia: 0 by 0. LSU: 6 by 25. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. New Mexico State: 2 by 28.3. Alabama: 2 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
28.3 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Maryland | L 13-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Alabama | L 24-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs New Mexico State | L 10-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Arkansas | W 48-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Vanderbilt | W 31-15 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 27-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Ole Miss | L 21-28 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ LSU | L 18-48 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Georgia | L 20-27 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ California | W 14-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Massachusetts | W 59-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Vanderbilt
2019-2022
Opening stop
Auburn
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 8 | 17.1 | 4.6 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | -8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 3 | 11.4 | 4.1 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 2 | 8.7 | 2 | -1 |
| 2023 Postseason | Auburn | 7 | 14.4 | 4.6 | 5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Auburn | 7 | 14.4 | 4.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#4
Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
#5
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
8 primary output · 17.1 efficiency · 4.6 usage
15.6
#2
2023 Postseason · Auburn
14.8
7 primary · 14.4 efficiency · 4.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Auburn
14.8
7 primary · 14.4 efficiency · 4.6 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8642
Rumson-Fair Haven · Rumson, NJ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
93
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.