Usage Score
23.6
Player Profile
Cam Johnson
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Brentwood, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cam Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.2
Consistency
68.2
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Northwestern
18192021222323
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Vanderbilt
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Northwestern
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Cam Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Northwestern. Cam Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Northwestern paired 715 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Arizona State, Northwestern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Northwestern
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
55
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
23.6
Consistency
68.2
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 31. Rutgers: 45. UTEP: 51. Duke: 45. Minnesota: 35. Penn State: 81. Unknown: 55. Nebraska: 27. Maryland: 46. Iowa: 30. Wisconsin: 57. Purdue: 88. Illinois: 124
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 4 by 51.7. Rutgers: 4 by 75. UTEP: 3 by 100. Duke: 5 by 60. Minnesota: 4 by 58.3. Penn State: 6 by 90. Unknown: 4 by 91.7. Nebraska: 3 by 60. Maryland: 2 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 66.7. Wisconsin: 6 by 63.3. Purdue: 3 by 100. Illinois: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins61.7 · n=7 · +16.1 vs Losses
Losses45.6 · n=5 · -16.1 vs Wins
First Half49 · n=7 · -13 vs Second Half
Second Half62 · n=6 · +13 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/24 | vs Utah | W 14-7 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards | W 45-43 | — | 7 | 124 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Purdue | W 23-15 | — | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Wisconsin | W 24-10 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Iowa | L 7-10 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Maryland | W 33-27 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Nebraska | L 9-17 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 55 | 12.6 | 13.80 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Penn State | L 13-41 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Minnesota | W 37-34 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Duke | L 14-38 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UTEP | W 38-7 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 43 |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Rutgers | L 7-24 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona State
2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Northwestern
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 45 | 71.1 | 5.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 316 | 63.9 | 15.3 | 271 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 528 | 65.1 | 28.3 | 212 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 327 | 63 | 16.7 | -201 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Arizona State | 84 | 55.1 | 10.5 | -243 |
| 2023 Postseason | Northwestern | 715 | 78.2 | 23.6 | 631 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Northwestern | 715 | 78.2 | 23.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124
Primary metric
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Northwestern
715 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 23.6 usage
67.5
#2
2023 Regular Season · Northwestern
67.5
715 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
56.1
528 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 28.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9381
St. Bernard · Playa Del Rey, CA
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,015
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.