Player Stats

Micah Baskerville College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
253
TFL
22.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
10
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonLSU3180.50--019.9
2019 Regular SeasonLSU91541-1225
2020 Regular SeasonLSU8554.502-045.6
2021 Regular SeasonLSU12839213064.2
2022 Regular SeasonLSU12824.5136267.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

LSU paired 15.5 primary output with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · LSU

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

40.3

Usage

11.3

Consistency

39.3

Best Game by takeover score

Ole Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern: 1. Mississippi State: 0. New Mexico: 0. Auburn: 2. Tennessee: 2. Florida: 3. Ole Miss: 4. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 1. UAB: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern: 1 by 14.2. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. New Mexico: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 3 by 32.5. Tennessee: 15 by 70. Florida: 11 by 75.8. Ole Miss: 9 by 77.5. Alabama: 7 by 39.2. Arkansas: 6 by 35. UAB: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 8 by 33.3. Georgia: 9 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 9 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 3 · -0.6 vs Wins