Player Stats

Andrew Ward College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
14
TFL
1
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonNebraska00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan11-0--037
2019 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan61310-1034.3
2020 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 12.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Central Michigan.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

12.4

Usage

2.3

Consistency

5.6

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAlbany: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Akron: 0. Miami: 2. Eastern Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAlbany: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 7 by 49.2. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 4 · -1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · +1 vs Wins