Usage Score
22.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022Central Michigan
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Petoskey, MI, USA
Joel Wilson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.6
Efficiency
67.4
Consistency
76
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joel Wilson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Joel Wilson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Joel Wilson played TE for Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joel Wilson recorded 1 rushing yards, 874 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 445 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
49.4
Efficiency
67.4
Usage
22.6
Consistency
76
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 64. South Alabama: 73. Unknown: 28. Penn State: 59. Toledo: 43. Ball State: 52. Akron: 18. Bowling Green: 75. Northern Illinois: 33
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 6 by 71.1. South Alabama: 7 by 69.5. Unknown: 3 by 62.2. Penn State: 5 by 78.7. Toledo: 4 by 71.7. Ball State: 6 by 57.8. Akron: 2 by 60. Bowling Green: 8 by 62.5. Northern Illinois: 3 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
78.7 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/2 | @ Northern Illinois | W 35-22 | — | 3 | 33 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Bowling GreenHigh volume | L 18-34 | — | 8 | 75 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Akron | W 28-21 | — | 2 | 18 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Ball State | L 16-17 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Toledo | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Penn State | L 14-33 | — | 5 | 59 | 10.2 | 11.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs South Alabama | L 24-38 | — | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 21 |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 44-58 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 5 | 33.3 | 5.3 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 7 | 46.7 | 3.7 | 2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 50 | 60 | 11.7 | 43 |
| 2021 Postseason | Central Michigan | 367 | 70.5 | 13.5 | 317 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 367 | 70.5 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 445 | 67.4 | 22.6 | 78 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 87.6 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 62.5 efficiency score.
#5
South Alabama
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 69.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Central Michigan
445 primary output · 67.4 efficiency · 22.6 usage
66
#2
2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
55.4
367 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 13.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan
55.4
367 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 13.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7898
Petoskey · Petoskey, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
874
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.