Usage Score
17.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023Central Michigan
Kobe Lewis
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Americus, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Kobe Lewis leans balanced backfield option traits and 39.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
39.7
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
40.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Central Michigan
18191920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Central Michigan • Purdue • Florida Atlantic
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kobe Lewis, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Central Michigan. Kobe Lewis leans balanced backfield option traits and 39.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 1,238 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 39.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Purdue, Florida Atlantic.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
46
Efficiency
39.7
Usage
17.2
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 1. Clemson: 63. Illinois: 3. Tulsa: 90. South Florida: 90. UTSA: 7. Charlotte: 21. UAB: 80. East Carolina: 20. Tulane: 48. Rice: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 3 by 3.5. Clemson: 17 by 37.3. Illinois: 3 by 10.4. Tulsa: 7 by 100. South Florida: 14 by 66.6. UTSA: 4 by 9.4. Charlotte: 7 by 28.8. UAB: 16 by 52.1. East Carolina: 10 by 13. Tulane: 12 by 27.6. Rice: 9 by 88.4
Split Comparison
Wins67 · n=3 · +28.9 vs Losses
Losses38.1 · n=8 · -28.9 vs Wins
First Half42.3 · n=6 · -8.1 vs Second Half
Second Half50.4 · n=5 · +8.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Rice | L 21-24 | 7 | 82 | 11.70 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9.2 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Tulane | L 8-24 | 8 | 14 | 1.80 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 4 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs East Carolina | L 7-22 | 8 | 6 | 0.80 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 2 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ UAB | L 42-45 | 16 | 80 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Charlotte | W 38-16 | 5 | 13 | 2.60 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UTSA | L 10-36 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1.8 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ South Florida | W 56-14 | 11 | 70 | 6.40 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Tulsa | W 20-17 | 6 | 87 | 14.50 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12.9 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Illinois | L 17-23 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Clemson | L 14-48 | 14 | 49 | 3.50 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | L 10-17 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | — | — | 0.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Purdue
2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Florida Atlantic
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 42 | 37.5 | 1.9 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1,238 | 54.5 | 24.8 | 1,196 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,238 | 54.5 | 24.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 540 | 47.1 | 31.1 | -698 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -540 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 202 | 34.1 | 6.7 | 202 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 506 | 39.7 | 17.2 | 304 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
183
Primary metric
183 scrimmage yards and 54.5 usage.
#2
Tulsa
90
Primary metric
Win with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#3
Rice
83
Primary metric
Loss with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 24.3 usage.
#4
New Mexico State
161
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
161 scrimmage yards and 32.9 usage.
#5
Ohio
146
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
146 scrimmage yards and 47.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Central Michigan
1,238 primary output · 54.5 efficiency · 24.8 usage
59
#2
2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan
59
1,238 primary · 54.5 efficiency · 24.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Central Michigan
48.9
540 primary · 47.1 efficiency · 31.1 usage
Milestones
8
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7798
Americus Sumter County South · Americus, GA
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,528
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.