Player Stats

Jack Combs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
131
Receptions
12
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan0-00-
2018 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan1327159.7
2019 Regular SeasonIowa0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonIowa0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonArkansas State49104070.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Arkansas State paired 104 primary output with 70.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Iowa, Arkansas State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Arkansas State

Games

4

Receiving Yards / G

26

Efficiency

70.3

Usage

10.6

Consistency

76.1

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 14. Georgia Southern: 42. South Alabama: 25. App State: 23

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 2 by 46.7. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 83.3. App State: 3 by 51.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half28 · Games = 2 · +4 vs Second Half
Second Half24 · Games = 2 · -4 vs First Half