Player Stats

Ari Broussard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,073
Rushing yards
991
Receiving yards
82
Touchdowns
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonRice3000050
2020 Regular SeasonRice41128032041.3
2021 Regular SeasonRice125695690357.9
2022 Regular SeasonRice728725136955.7
2023 PostseasonRice9000027.7
2023 Regular SeasonRice91059114027.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Rice paired 569 primary output with 45.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 39.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Southern

Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Rice

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

11.7

Efficiency

39.8

Usage

6.2

Consistency

34.8

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 0. Texas Southern: 32. South Florida: 0. East Carolina: 4. UConn: 28. Tulsa: 17. SMU: 0. Charlotte: 17. Florida Atlantic: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Southern: 10 by 33.3. East Carolina: 3 by 13.9. UConn: 5 by 52.5. Tulsa: 4 by 44.3. Charlotte: 8 by 22.1. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 72.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins15.4 · Games = 5 · +8.4 vs Losses
Losses7 · Games = 4 · -8.4 vs Wins