Player Dossier

2018-2023

Miami

Mark Pope

WR • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Miami, FL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Mark Pope reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

16.4

Efficiency

69.3

Consistency

30.7

Season Value

53.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami

18191920202123

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Miami • Massachusetts
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Liberty

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Mark Pope, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami. Mark Pope reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Miami paired 403 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 69.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, Massachusetts.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Liberty

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

35

Efficiency

69.3

Usage

16.4

Consistency

30.7

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 13. New Mexico State: 3. Miami (OH): 70. Eastern Michigan: 0. New Mexico: 81. Arkansas State: 85. Toledo: 20. Penn State: 9. Army: 10. Unknown: 10. Liberty: 90. UConn: 29

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 1 by 86.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 4 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Arkansas State: 6 by 94.4. Toledo: 4 by 33.3. Penn State: 2 by 30. Army: 1 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Liberty: 6 by 100. UConn: 3 by 64.4

Split Comparison

Wins6.5 · n=2 · -37.6 vs Losses
Losses44.1 · n=9 · +37.6 vs Wins
First Half42 · n=6 · +14 vs Second Half
Second Half28 · n=6 · -14 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Liberty

Best efficiency game

100 vs Liberty

Result
Sat 11/25vs UConnL 18-313299.79.70015
Sat 11/18@ LibertyL 25-496901515043
Sat 11/4vs Unknown110610010
Sat 10/28@ ArmyW 21-141100.510010
Sat 10/14@ Penn StateL 0-63294.54.5009
Sat 10/7vs ToledoL 24-4142055015
Sat 9/30vs Arkansas StateL 28-5268513.314.20028
Sat 9/23vs New MexicoL 31-3448120.320.30054
Sat 9/16@ Eastern MichiganL 17-1911
Sat 9/9vs Miami (OH)L 28-4147017.517.50150
Sat 9/2@ AuburnL 14-591131313013
Sat 8/26@ New Mexico StateW 41-30130303

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Miami

    2018-2021

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Massachusetts

    2023

    Final stop

Season Progression

2018201920192020202020212023
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2018 Regular SeasonMiami1173.34.8
2019 PostseasonMiami26659.28.6255
2019 Regular SeasonMiami26659.28.60
2020 PostseasonMiami40372.416.4137
2020 Regular SeasonMiami40372.416.40
2021 Regular SeasonMiami0-403
2023 Regular SeasonMassachusetts42069.316.4420

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Liberty

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

90

Primary metric

90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

NC State

97

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

New Mexico

81

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Unknown

92

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Arkansas State

85

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2020 Postseason · Miami

403 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 16.4 usage

61.2

#2

2020 Regular Season · Miami

61.2

403 primary · 72.4 efficiency · 16.4 usage

#3

2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts

53.4

420 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 16.4 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2018 · Rating 0.9656

Miami Southridge · Hialeah, FL

Committed To
Miami
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2018

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,100

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Mark Pope quick answers

Recruiting profile

4-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
2
Seasons tracked
7
Career receiving yards
1,100