Usage Score
16.4
Player Dossier
2018-2023Miami
WR • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Mark Pope reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.4
Efficiency
69.3
Consistency
30.7
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Pope, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Miami. Mark Pope reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Miami paired 403 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35
Efficiency
69.3
Usage
16.4
Consistency
30.7
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 13. New Mexico State: 3. Miami (OH): 70. Eastern Michigan: 0. New Mexico: 81. Arkansas State: 85. Toledo: 20. Penn State: 9. Army: 10. Unknown: 10. Liberty: 90. UConn: 29
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 1 by 86.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 4 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Arkansas State: 6 by 94.4. Toledo: 4 by 33.3. Penn State: 2 by 30. Army: 1 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Liberty: 6 by 100. UConn: 3 by 64.4
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Liberty
Best efficiency game
100 vs Liberty
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UConn | L 18-31 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Liberty | L 25-49 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Army | W 21-14 | — | 1 | 10 | 0.5 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Penn State | L 0-63 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Toledo | L 24-41 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arkansas State | L 28-52 | — | 6 | 85 | 13.3 | 14.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs New Mexico | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 17-19 | — | — | — | 11 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Miami (OH) | L 28-41 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Auburn | L 14-59 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/26 | @ New Mexico State | W 41-30 | — | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2018-2021
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami | 11 | 73.3 | 4.8 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami | 266 | 59.2 | 8.6 | 255 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami | 266 | 59.2 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Miami | 403 | 72.4 | 16.4 | 137 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami | 403 | 72.4 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami | 0 | — | — | -403 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 420 | 69.3 | 16.4 | 420 |
#1 Featured game
Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
92
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Miami
403 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 16.4 usage
61.2
#2
2020 Regular Season · Miami
61.2
403 primary · 72.4 efficiency · 16.4 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
53.4
420 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 16.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9656
Miami Southridge · Hialeah, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,100
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Mark Pope quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit