Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 3,721 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.7 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2 | 279 | 268 | 11 | 3 | 37.4 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tulsa | 13 | 303 | 285 | 18 | 2 | 64.6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulsa | 13 | 3,026 | 2,969 | 57 | 17 | 64.6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 9 | 2,061 | 2,138 | -77 | 19 | 49.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 13 | 327 | 350 | -23 | 2 | 72.1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 13 | 3,394 | 3,431 | -37 | 23 | 72.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 3,721 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Georgia Southern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
286.2
Efficiency
54.2
Usage
20.6
Consistency
88.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 327. The Citadel: 243. UAB: 336. Wisconsin: 361. Ball State: 352. Coastal Carolina: 324. James Madison: 253. UL Monroe: 208. Georgia State: 321. Texas State: 198. Marshall: 313. Old Dominion: 246. App State: 239
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 51 by 54.3. The Citadel: 39 by 55.1. UAB: 53 by 64.7. Wisconsin: 59 by 46.6. Ball State: 49 by 65.7. Coastal Carolina: 60 by 53.4. James Madison: 58 by 46.9. UL Monroe: 39 by 47.2. Georgia State: 44 by 57.7. Texas State: 34 by 54.1. Marshall: 60 by 52.8. Old Dominion: 42 by 57.2. App State: 38 by 49
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.