Player Stats

Terrance Taylor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
122
TFL
27.5
Sacks
13.5
QB hurries
15
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonToledo92-0--041.9
2018 Regular SeasonToledo9145.52.521041.9
2019 Regular SeasonToledo9265.53--040.1
2020 Regular SeasonToledo4204.51.521073.3
2021 Regular SeasonToledo6196331064.9
2022 Regular SeasonToledo35-041055.8
2023 PostseasonToledo101-0--060.2
2023 Regular SeasonToledo103563.54-060.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Toledo paired 9 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Loss with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Toledo

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

28

Usage

9.7

Consistency

31.9

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Illinois: 5.5. Texas Southern: 2. San José State: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Ball State: 0.5. Miami (OH): 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 2.5. Miami (OH): 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 6 by 75. Texas Southern: 4 by 36.7. San José State: 5 by 20.8. Massachusetts: 2 by 18.3. Ball State: 3 by 17.5. Miami (OH): 5 by 20.8. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 5 by 45.8. Miami (OH): 1 by 24.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 7 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses2.5 · Games = 3 · +1.6 vs Wins