Player Stats

Desjuan Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
206
TFL
41.5
Sacks
14.5
QB hurries
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonToledo817311-027.2
2019 Regular SeasonToledo1132715-052.8
2020 Regular SeasonToledo5266.52.52-065.8
2021 PostseasonToledo1330.50--068
2021 Regular SeasonToledo1367124.55-068
2022 Regular SeasonToledo126112.55.52-071.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Toledo paired 21 primary output with 38.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 38.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green

Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Toledo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

38.7

Usage

10.8

Consistency

60.8

Best Game by takeover score

Bowling Green

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Long Island University: 0.5. Massachusetts: 1.5. Ohio State: 0. San Diego State: 1. Central Michigan: 2. Northern Illinois: 2. Kent State: 0. Buffalo: 1. Eastern Michigan: 3. Ball State: 2. Bowling Green: 4.5. Western Michigan: 3.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Long Island University: 7 by 34.2. Massachusetts: 6 by 40. Ohio State: 3 by 12.5. San Diego State: 6 by 35. Central Michigan: 2 by 28.3. Northern Illinois: 8 by 53.3. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. Buffalo: 3 by 22.5. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 55. Ball State: 6 by 45. Bowling Green: 6 by 70. Western Michigan: 4 by 51.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Wins