Player Stats

Dyontae Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
258
TFL
21
Sacks
6.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonToledo58-01-010.5
2019 Regular SeasonToledo10232021021
2020 Regular SeasonToledo6474.511-056.3
2021 PostseasonToledo13100.50--064.8
2021 Regular SeasonToledo13767.52.524064.8
2022 Regular SeasonToledo12946.53-3060.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Toledo paired 17.5 primary output with 40.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 43.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ball State

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Toledo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

43.1

Usage

8.6

Consistency

57.5

Best Game by takeover score

Ball State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Long Island University: 0. Massachusetts: 0.5. Ohio State: 1. San Diego State: 2.5. Central Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 1. Kent State: 0.5. Buffalo: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Ball State: 2. Bowling Green: 2. Western Michigan: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Long Island University: 5 by 20.8. Massachusetts: 6 by 30. Ohio State: 10 by 51.7. San Diego State: 3 by 37.5. Central Michigan: 7 by 29.2. Northern Illinois: 9 by 47.5. Kent State: 7 by 34.2. Buffalo: 12 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 10 by 61.7. Ball State: 11 by 65.8. Bowling Green: 9 by 57.5. Western Michigan: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Wins