Player Stats

Nate Bauer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
238
TFL
16
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonToledo24-0--040.2
2019 Regular SeasonToledo123830-1023.1
2020 Regular SeasonToledo62310-1036.3
2021 PostseasonToledo13510--054
2021 Regular SeasonToledo13495.51.5-1054
2022 Regular SeasonToledo12543.5114052.8
2023 PostseasonToledo121010-1034.6
2023 Regular SeasonToledo125510-2034.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Toledo paired 10 primary output with 25 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Toledo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

28.1

Usage

5.3

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Wyoming

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 2. Illinois: 0. Texas Southern: 1. San José State: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Ball State: 0. Miami (OH): 1. Bowling Green: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 10 by 61.7. Illinois: 8 by 33.3. San José State: 2 by 18.3. Western Michigan: 13 by 50. Northern Illinois: 7 by 29.2. Massachusetts: 7 by 29.2. Ball State: 6 by 25. Miami (OH): 2 by 18.3. Bowling Green: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 9 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Wins