Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
West Virginia paired 122 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | West Virginia | 4 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 23.7 |
| 2020 Postseason | West Virginia | 6 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 61.1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | West Virginia | 6 | 11 | 111 | 0 | 61.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | West Virginia | 4 | 11 | 65 | 0 | 44.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | West Virginia | 3 | 5 | 66 | 0 | 51.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Houston | 9 | 12 | 94 | 0 | 49.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
West Virginia paired 122 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 77.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
10.4
Efficiency
50.2
Usage
5.8
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 6. TCU: 3. Sam Houston: 9. Texas Tech: 8. West Virginia: 8. Texas: 19. Baylor: 21. Cincinnati: 18. Oklahoma State: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 1 by 40. TCU: 1 by 20. Sam Houston: 1 by 60. Texas Tech: 1 by 53.3. West Virginia: 1 by 53.3. Texas: 3 by 42.2. Baylor: 2 by 70. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Oklahoma State: 1 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.