Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTEP
FB • 5'10" • 230 lbs • Allen, TX, USA
James Tupou leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 84.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
21
Developing production for a back
Reliability
18
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
34
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
James Tupou built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a FB from Allen, TX wearing No. 31, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of James Tupou's career was his receiving role: 17 catches, 223 receiving...
Read the storyJames Tupou, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP. James Tupou leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 84.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 14.8 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 8 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 31 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 39 | 14 | 25 | 0 | 31 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 9 | 164 | 12 | 152 | 2 | 64.5 |
Related Context
James Tupou played FB for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, James Tupou recorded 26 rushing yards, 223 receiving yards, and 13 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTEP paired 164 primary output with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 39 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
18.2
Efficiency
84.5
Usage
2.7
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 24. North Texas: 8. New Mexico State: 24. New Mexico: 8. Florida Atlantic: 20. Middle Tennessee: 14. Rice: 10. Florida International: 17. UTSA: 39
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 66.7. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 66.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 100. Rice: 2 by 41.7. Florida International: 2 by 85.4. UTSA: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida International | W 40-6 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8.5 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Rice | L 30-37 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 24-21 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico | L 10-27 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State | W 20-13 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 24 | 12 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-45 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 24 | 24 |
| Sun 8/28 | vs North Texas | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 |
Player Story
James Tupou built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a FB from Allen, TX wearing No. 31, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of James Tupou's career was his receiving role: 17 catches, 223 receiving yards, 2 touchdowns, and 26 rushing yards across 28 career games in the available record. His career also includes 26 rushing yards, 13 tackles, and 1 return yard, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives James Tupou's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 5 | 20.8 | 1.5 | 5 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 80 | 49.5 | 1.9 | 75 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 80 | 49.5 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 164 | 84.5 | 2.7 | 84 |
#1 Featured game
@ UTSA
Week 13 · L 31-34 · Conference game
Loss with 39 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
39
Scrimmage Yards
70.2 takeover
39 scrimmage yards and 3.7 usage.
#2
@ Fresno State
Week 1 · L 24-31 · Postseason
41
Scrimmage Yards
69 takeover
Loss with 41 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
41 scrimmage yards and 2.4 usage.
#3
vs New Mexico State
Week 2 · W 20-13
24
Scrimmage Yards
58.3 takeover
Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24 scrimmage yards and 4.7 usage.
#4
@ Florida Atlantic
Week 9 · L 25-28 · Conference game
25
Scrimmage Yards
55.5 takeover
Loss with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
25 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
#5
@ Oklahoma
Week 1 · L 13-45
24
Scrimmage Yards
55.4 takeover
Loss with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
164 primary output · 84.5 efficiency · 2.7 usage
64.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
33.8
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.