Usage Score
26.4
Player Dossier
2017-2021UTEP
Justin Garrett
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Compton, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Justin Garrett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.1
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
67.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Garrett, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP. Justin Garrett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
UTEP paired 685 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · UTEP
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.7
Efficiency
82.1
Usage
26.4
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 26. Unknown: 45. New Mexico State: 74. Boise State: 35. New Mexico: 105. Old Dominion: 46. Southern Miss: 0. Louisiana Tech: 33. Florida Atlantic: 109. UTSA: 26. North Texas: 69. Rice: 82. UAB: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 60. New Mexico State: 4 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Old Dominion: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 44. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 100. UTSA: 3 by 57.8. North Texas: 7 by 65.7. Rice: 5 by 100. UAB: 4 by 58.3
Split Comparison
Wins56.7 · n=6 · +6.7 vs Losses
Losses50 · n=6 · -6.7 vs Wins
First Half47.3 · n=7 · -11.7 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · n=6 · +11.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ Fresno State | L 24-31 | — | 1 | 26 | 19 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ UAB | L 25-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Rice | W 38-28 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ North Texas | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs UTSA | L 23-44 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards | L 25-28 | — | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 44 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 19-3 | — | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Southern Miss | W 26-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/3 | vs Old Dominion | W 28-21 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards | W 20-13 | — | 4 | 105 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Boise State | L 13-54 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 8/29 | @ New Mexico State | W 30-3 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 428 | 73.1 | 29.2 | 428 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 510 | 82 | 30.3 | 82 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 685 | 82.1 | 26.4 | 175 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 685 | 82.1 | 26.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · UTEP
685 primary output · 82.1 efficiency · 26.4 usage
67.1
#2
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
67.1
685 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 26.4 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
65.9
510 primary · 82 efficiency · 30.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8319
North Miami Beach Senior · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Northern Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,623
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.