Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2017-2021UTEP
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Compton, CA, USA
Justin Garrett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
25
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
28
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Justin Garrett built his college career from 2017 through 2021 as a wide receiver from Compton, CA wearing No. 2, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Justin Garrett's career was his receiving role: 127...
Read the storyJustin Garrett, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · UTEP. Justin Garrett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 39 | 428 | 3 | 72.3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 38 | 510 | 3 | 82.7 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 13 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 82.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 49 | 659 | 4 | 82.5 |
Related Context
Justin Garrett played WR for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Justin Garrett recorded 12 rushing yards, 1,623 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
UTEP paired 510 primary output with 82 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.7
Efficiency
82.1
Usage
26.4
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 26. Bethune-Cookman: 45. New Mexico State: 74. Boise State: 35. New Mexico: 105. Old Dominion: 46. Southern Miss: 0. Louisiana Tech: 33. Florida Atlantic: 109. UTSA: 26. North Texas: 69. Rice: 82. UAB: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 1 by 100. Bethune-Cookman: 5 by 60. New Mexico State: 4 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Old Dominion: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 44. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 100. UTSA: 3 by 57.8. North Texas: 7 by 65.7. Rice: 5 by 100. UAB: 4 by 58.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ Fresno State | L 24-31 | — | 1 | 26 | 19 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ UAB | L 25-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Rice | W 38-28 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ North Texas | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs UTSA | L 23-44 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards | L 25-28 | — | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 44 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 19-3 | — | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Southern Miss | W 26-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/3 | vs Old Dominion | W 28-21 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards | W 20-13 | — | 4 | 105 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Boise State | L 13-54 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Bethune-Cookman | W 38-28 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 8/29 | @ New Mexico State | W 30-3 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 36 |
Player Story
Justin Garrett built his college career from 2017 through 2021 as a wide receiver from Compton, CA wearing No. 2, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Justin Garrett's career was his receiving role: 127 catches, 1,623 receiving yards, 10 touchdowns, and 12 rushing yards across 33 career games in the available record. His career also includes 12 rushing yards, 1 tackle, and 422 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Justin Garrett's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 428 | 73.1 | 29.2 | 428 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 510 | 82 | 30.3 | 82 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 685 | 82.1 | 26.4 | 175 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 685 | 82.1 | 26.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ UL Monroe
Week 4 · W 31-6
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Florida Atlantic
Week 9 · L 25-28 · Conference game
109
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs New Mexico
Week 4 · W 20-13
105
Receiving Yards
95.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Charlotte
Week 8 · L 28-38 · Conference game
107
Receiving Yards
89.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#5
@ New Mexico State
Week 1 · W 30-3
74
Receiving Yards
89.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
510 primary output · 82 efficiency · 30.3 usage
82.7
#2
2021 Postseason · UTEP
82.5
685 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 26.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
82.5
685 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 26.4 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.