Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTEP paired 734 primary output with 50.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Brandon Jones College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 1,415
- Passing yards
- 1,301
- Rushing yards
- 114
- Touchdowns
- 9
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 734 | 673 | 61 | 6 | 60.3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 681 | 628 | 53 | 3 | 57 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 50.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston Christian
Win with 301 yards of offense and 63.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
6
Primary Metric / G
113.5
Efficiency
50.1
Usage
16.1
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
Houston Christian
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston Christian: 301. Texas Tech: 20. Nevada: 129. Southern Miss: 56. UTSA: 135. Florida International: 40
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston Christian: 33 by 63.8. Texas Tech: 15 by 37. Nevada: 19 by 61.4. Southern Miss: 18 by 46. UTSA: 25 by 54.2. Florida International: 15 by 38.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins301 · Games = 1 · +225 vs Losses
Losses76 · Games = 5 · -225 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Brandon Jones
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.