Player Stats

Dion Bergan Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
73
TFL
13.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonWake Forest5110--013.2
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest540.50--013.2
2019 PostseasonWake Forest122-0--026.2
2019 Regular SeasonWake Forest12183.51.5--026.2
2020 Regular SeasonWake Forest6103.511-041.4
2021 PostseasonWake Forest11311-1050.3
2021 Regular SeasonWake Forest11173.50.511050.3
2022 Regular SeasonWake Forest10180.501-011.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Wake Forest paired 9 primary output with 15.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.1

Efficiency

9

Usage

1.6

Consistency

6.7

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. VMI: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Liberty: 0.5. Clemson: 0. Florida State: 0. Army: 0. Boston College: 1. North Carolina: 0. Syracuse: 0. Duke: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. VMI: 1 by 4.2. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Liberty: 2 by 13.3. Clemson: 5 by 20.8. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Army: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 0 by 10. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 7 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.2 vs Wins