Player Stats

Caleb Okechukwu College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
119
TFL
22.5
Sacks
14
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
1
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonSyracuse00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonSyracuse81411--09.7
2021 Regular SeasonSyracuse10223.51.5--020
2022 Regular SeasonSyracuse12471076-267
2023 PostseasonSyracuse10311--054
2023 Regular SeasonSyracuse103373.521054

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Syracuse paired 24 primary output with 34.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 30.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Syracuse

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.6

Efficiency

30.5

Usage

10.1

Consistency

36.8

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Florida: 2. Colgate: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Army: 1. Clemson: 5. North Carolina: 1. Virginia Tech: 0. Boston College: 0.5. Georgia Tech: 2. Wake Forest: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Florida: 3 by 32.5. Colgate: 3 by 22.5. Western Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Army: 4 by 26.7. Clemson: 4 by 66.7. North Carolina: 1 by 14.2. Virginia Tech: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 7 by 34.2. Georgia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Wake Forest: 4 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Wins