Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2019-2023Georgia Southern
Anthony Queeley
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Orlando, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Anthony Queeley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.8
Consistency
70
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Syracuse
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Syracuse • Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Queeley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Syracuse. Anthony Queeley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Anthony Queeley played WR for Syracuse and Georgia Southern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Anthony Queeley recorded 887 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Syracuse.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 378 primary output with 67.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, Georgia Southern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
34.4
Efficiency
66.8
Usage
12
Consistency
70
Best Game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 38. UAB: 51. Wisconsin: 24. Ball State: 36. Coastal Carolina: 51. James Madison: 22. Texas State: 27. Old Dominion: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 63.3. UAB: 5 by 68. Wisconsin: 3 by 53.3. Ball State: 4 by 60. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 85. James Madison: 2 by 73.3. Texas State: 4 by 45. Old Dominion: 2 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins46 · Games = 3 · +21.3 vs Losses
Losses24.8 · Games = 4 · -21.3 vs Wins
First Half37.3 · Games = 4 · +5.8 vs Second Half
Second Half31.5 · Games = 4 · -5.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Old Dominion
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | vs Old Dominion | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Texas State | L 24-45 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ James Madison | L 13-41 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 38-28 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Ball State | W 40-3 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UAB | W 49-35 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Syracuse
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia Southern
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Syracuse | 378 | 67.3 | 24.1 | 378 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 222 | 83.3 | 13.7 | -156 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Syracuse | 12 | 80 | 5.6 | -210 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 275 | 66.8 | 12 | 263 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#4
Coastal Carolina
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Syracuse
378 primary output · 67.3 efficiency · 24.1 usage
63.2
#2
2021 Regular Season · Syracuse
56.9
222 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
55.2
275 primary · 66.8 efficiency · 12 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8498
Lake Nona · Orlando, FL
- Committed To
- Syracuse
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
887
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.