Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2018-2021Oklahoma State
S • 6'0" • 207 lbs • College Station, TX, USA
Kolby Harvell-Peel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
29.8
Consistency
55.6
Season Value
37.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kolby Harvell-Peel, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Kolby Harvell-Peel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.8 disruption score.
Kolby Harvell-Peel played S for Oklahoma State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kolby Harvell-Peel recorded 231 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Oklahoma State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 21 primary output with 40.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
29.8
Usage
6
Consistency
55.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Missouri State: 1. Tulsa: 0.5. Boise State: 2. Kansas State: 2. Baylor: 0. Texas: 0. Iowa State: 0. Kansas: 1. West Virginia: 0. TCU: 2. Texas Tech: 2. Oklahoma: 1. Baylor: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 8 by 43.3. Missouri State: 7 by 39.2. Tulsa: 7 by 34.2. Boise State: 4 by 36.7. Kansas State: 8 by 53.3. Baylor: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 7 by 29.2. Iowa State: 6 by 25. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. West Virginia: 7 by 29.2. TCU: 3 by 32.5. Texas Tech: 2 by 28.3. Oklahoma: 5 by 30.8. Baylor: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ Notre Dame | W 37-35 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Baylor | L 16-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oklahoma | W 37-33 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Texas TechSplash game | W 23-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/14 | vs TCUSplash game | W 63-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ West Virginia | W 24-3 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Kansas | W 55-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Iowa State | L 21-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Texas | W 32-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Baylor | W 24-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Kansas StateSplash game | W 31-20 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Boise StateSplash game | W 21-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Tulsa | W 28-23 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Missouri State | W 23-16 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 10.5 | 29.2 | 6.1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 10.5 | 29.2 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 21 | 40.1 | 7.8 | 10.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 10 | 28.3 | 5.1 | -11 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 10 | 28.3 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | 29.8 | 6 | 2.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | 29.8 | 6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with 7 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#2
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#4
TCU
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54 takeover score.
#5
South Alabama
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
21 primary output · 40.1 efficiency · 7.8 usage
48.3
#2
2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
37.7
12.5 primary · 29.8 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
37.7
12.5 primary · 29.8 efficiency · 6 usage
1
Impact games
14
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8539
A&M Consolidated · College Station, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
231
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.