Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022Ohio State
S • 5'11" • 195 lbs • Heath, TX, USA
Tanner McCalister shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.9
Efficiency
13.4
Consistency
6.1
Season Value
8.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tanner McCalister, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Tanner McCalister shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.4 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 7 primary output with 21.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 13.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma State, Ohio State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
13.4
Usage
3.9
Consistency
6.1
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Rutgers: 0. Michigan State: 0. Iowa: 2. Penn State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0. Maryland: 0. Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 4 by 36.7. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Penn State: 3 by 12.5. Northwestern: 2 by 8.3. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 4 by 16.7. Michigan: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
40 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan | L 23-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Maryland | W 43-30 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Indiana | W 56-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Penn State | W 44-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs IowaSplash game | W 54-10 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan State | W 49-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Rutgers | W 49-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Wisconsin | W 52-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Arkansas State | W 45-12 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Notre Dame | W 21-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Ohio State
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1 | 9.3 | 1.3 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1 | 9.3 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1.5 | 12.7 | 2.7 | 0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1.5 | 12.7 | 2.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 7 | 21.9 | 3.7 | 5.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 7 | 21.9 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 8 | 18.2 | 3.2 | 1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 8 | 18.2 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio State | 4 | 13.4 | 3.9 | -4 |
#1 Featured game
TCU
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#2
Iowa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#3
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.9 takeover score.
#4
TCU
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State
7 primary output · 21.9 efficiency · 3.7 usage
14.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
14.8
7 primary · 21.9 efficiency · 3.7 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
14.2
8 primary · 18.2 efficiency · 3.2 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.871
Rockwall-Heath · Rockwall, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
145
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tanner McCalister quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit