Player Stats

Divaad Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
149
TFL
5.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonGeorgia1410-1056.3
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia1124-0-1015.7
2020 PostseasonUCF4310--032.4
2020 Regular SeasonUCF48-0-1032.4
2021 PostseasonUCF137-0--047.9
2021 Regular SeasonUCF13652.5113047.9
2022 Regular SeasonUCF12381023044.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Georgia paired 2 primary output with 36.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: SMU

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · UCF

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

21.5

Usage

5.6

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

SMU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Carolina State: 1. Louisville: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Georgia Tech: 1. SMU: 3. Temple: 0. East Carolina: 0. Cincinnati: 2. Memphis: 2. Navy: 0. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 4 by 16.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 7 by 59.2. Temple: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 6 by 25. Cincinnati: 2 by 28.3. Memphis: 5 by 40.8. Navy: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 8 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · -1.1 vs Wins