Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Iowa State paired 33.5 primary output with 37.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Iowa State | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 15 |
| 2019 Postseason | Iowa State | 10 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Iowa State | 10 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | - | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2020 Postseason | Iowa State | 11 | 4 | 1.5 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 72 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Iowa State | 11 | 29 | 11.5 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 72 |
| 2021 Postseason | Iowa State | 12 | 4 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 73.3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Iowa State | 12 | 32 | 13 | 11.5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 73.3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa State | 12 | 36 | 7.5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 62.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Iowa State paired 33.5 primary output with 37.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 32.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
32.1
Usage
11.3
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southeast Missouri State: 1. Iowa: 1. Ohio: 3. Baylor: 1. Kansas: 3. Kansas State: 4. Texas: 0. Oklahoma: 1. West Virginia: 3.5. Oklahoma State: 1. Texas Tech: 2. TCU: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southeast Missouri State: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 2 by 18.3. Ohio: 1 by 34.2. Baylor: 5 by 30.8. Kansas: 2 by 38.3. Kansas State: 4 by 56.7. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma: 5 by 30.8. West Virginia: 4 by 51.7. Oklahoma State: 3 by 22.5. Texas Tech: 3 by 32.5. TCU: 3 by 42.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.