Player Stats

Joseph Scates College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,130
Receptions
67
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonIowa State2225141.4
2020 Regular SeasonIowa State56134250.2
2021 Regular SeasonIowa State48145155.4
2022 PostseasonMemphis9142067.7
2022 Regular SeasonMemphis917370467.7
2023 PostseasonMemphis11375166.9
2023 Regular SeasonMemphis1130339566.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Memphis paired 412 primary output with 87.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 69 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa State, Memphis.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Memphis

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

37.6

Efficiency

69

Usage

12.2

Consistency

57.9

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 75. Arkansas State: 49. Navy: 31. Missouri: 6. Tulane: 28. UAB: 6. North Texas: 44. South Florida: 16. Charlotte: 55. SMU: 26. Temple: 78

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 3 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Navy: 5 by 41.3. Missouri: 2 by 20. Tulane: 1 by 100. UAB: 2 by 20. North Texas: 3 by 97.8. South Florida: 2 by 53.3. Charlotte: 4 by 91.7. SMU: 5 by 34.7. Temple: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins44.3 · Games = 8 · +24.3 vs Losses
Losses20 · Games = 3 · -24.3 vs Wins