Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022Pittsburgh
Shocky Jacques-Louis
WR • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Fort Myers, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Shocky Jacques-Louis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.6
Consistency
64.5
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Akron
18191920212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh • Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shocky Jacques-Louis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Akron. Shocky Jacques-Louis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Akron paired 817 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Akron
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
68.1
Efficiency
76.6
Usage
22.8
Consistency
64.5
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 102. Michigan State: 31. Tennessee: 103. Liberty: 41. Bowling Green: 60. Ohio: 152. Central Michigan: 70. Kent State: 88. Miami (OH): 103. Eastern Michigan: 30. Northern Illinois: 37. Buffalo: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 8 by 85. Michigan State: 3 by 68.9. Tennessee: 9 by 76.3. Liberty: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 5 by 80. Ohio: 11 by 92.1. Central Michigan: 5 by 93.3. Kent State: 10 by 58.7. Miami (OH): 9 by 76.3. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 50. Northern Illinois: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Losses67.8 · n=10
First Half81.5 · n=6 · +26.8 vs Second Half
Second Half54.7 · n=6 · -26.8 vs First Half
All Games68.1 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Liberty
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/2 | @ Buffalo | L 22-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Northern Illinois | W 44-12 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 28-34 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | L 9-27 | — | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kent StateHigh volume | L 27-33 | — | 10 | 88 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Central Michigan | L 21-28 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-55 | — | 11 | 152 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-31 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Liberty | L 12-21 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 6-63 | — | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Michigan State | L 0-52 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 102 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Akron
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 76 | 54.8 | 12 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 348 | 80.9 | 13.6 | 272 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 348 | 80.9 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 327 | 69.7 | 12 | -21 |
| 2021 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 259 | 59.4 | 8.5 | -68 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 259 | 59.4 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Akron | 817 | 76.6 | 22.8 | 558 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152
Primary metric
152 receiving yards with a 92.1 efficiency score.
#2
North Carolina
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
68
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Akron
817 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 22.8 usage
65.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
48.3
327 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh
43.5
348 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8763
Dunbar · Fort Myers, FL
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,827
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.