Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2019-2023Massachusetts
TE • 6'5" • 235 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Josiah Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.2
Efficiency
47.9
Consistency
58.7
Season Value
53
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josiah Johnson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Josiah Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 90 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 47.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Massachusetts, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
15.1
Efficiency
47.9
Usage
8.2
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 3. Unknown: 8. South Alabama: 25. Iowa State: 2. Kansas State: 31. Kansas: 7. West Virginia: 10. Cincinnati: 29. Oklahoma: 13. Houston: 21. BYU: 17
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 20. Unknown: 2 by 26.7. South Alabama: 2 by 83.3. Iowa State: 1 by 13.3. Kansas State: 3 by 68.9. Kansas: 2 by 23.3. West Virginia: 1 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 4 by 21.7. Houston: 3 by 46.7. BYU: 2 by 56.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 31-23 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs BYU | W 40-34 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Houston | W 43-30 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Oklahoma | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-13 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ West Virginia | W 48-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Kansas | W 39-32 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Kansas State | W 29-21 | — | 3 | 31 | 7.8 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Iowa State | L 27-34 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs South Alabama | L 7-33 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Massachusetts
2019-2022
Opening stop
Oklahoma State
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 136 | 50.1 | 11.1 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 90 | 78.3 | 25.4 | -46 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 115 | 57 | 11.1 | 25 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 162 | 42.8 | 20.6 | 47 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 166 | 47.9 | 8.2 | 4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 166 | 47.9 | 8.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31
Primary metric
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
BYU
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Massachusetts
90 primary output · 78.3 efficiency · 25.4 usage
54.1
#2
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
53
166 primary · 47.9 efficiency · 8.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
53
166 primary · 47.9 efficiency · 8.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8826
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
669
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Josiah Johnson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit