Player Stats

Tyler Baker-Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
150
TFL
11.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
16
Passes defended
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonNC State41-0--07.3
2018 Regular SeasonNC State44-0-107.3
2019 Regular SeasonNC State11371.50.513023.9
2020 PostseasonNC State104101-072.2
2020 Regular SeasonNC State10553.5248072.2
2021 Regular SeasonNC State10323084058.5
2022 Regular SeasonNC State6172.5121040.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

NC State paired 20.5 primary output with 44.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Charleston Southern

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · NC State

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

26

Usage

6.5

Consistency

40.2

Best Game by takeover score

Charleston Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 2. Charleston Southern: 3.5. Texas Tech: 0. Syracuse: 0. Virginia Tech: 3. Wake Forest: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 1 by 24.2. Charleston Southern: 2 by 43.3. Texas Tech: 3 by 12.5. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. Virginia Tech: 3 by 42.5. Wake Forest: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.7 · Games = 5 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -1.7 vs Wins