Player Stats

Amechi Uzodinma II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
171
TFL
4
Sacks
1
Passes defended
33
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonBall State915-0-5029.6
2019 Regular SeasonBall State1238-0-12053.8
2020 PostseasonBall State82-0--038.7
2020 Regular SeasonBall State83321-5238.7
2021 PostseasonBall State112-0--019.9
2021 Regular SeasonBall State113510-3019.9
2022 Regular SeasonBall State124610-8049

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Ball State paired 17 primary output with 28.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Ball State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

26

Usage

4.2

Consistency

64.5

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Murray State: 1. Georgia Southern: 2. Northern Illinois: 1. Central Michigan: 1. UConn: 0. Eastern Michigan: 3. Kent State: 0. Toledo: 1. Ohio: 1. Miami (OH): 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 5 by 20.8. Western Michigan: 3 by 22.5. Murray State: 2 by 18.3. Georgia Southern: 7 by 49.2. Northern Illinois: 6 by 35. Central Michigan: 3 by 22.5. UConn: 1 by 4.2. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 46.7. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. Toledo: 5 by 30.8. Ohio: 4 by 26.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 7 · +0.7 vs Wins