Player Stats

Yo'Heinz Tyler College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,254
Receptions
180
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonBall State714226248.1
2019 Regular SeasonBall State1127504573.3
2020 PostseasonBall State84103190.4
2020 Regular SeasonBall State838504790.4
2021 PostseasonBall State13552065.2
2021 Regular SeasonBall State1344435665.2
2022 Regular SeasonBall State1148430163.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Ball State paired 607 primary output with 86.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 56.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Ball State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

39.1

Efficiency

56.2

Usage

17.4

Consistency

69

Best Game by takeover score

Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 62. Western Michigan: 52. Murray State: 35. Georgia Southern: 65. Northern Illinois: 73. Central Michigan: 46. UConn: 12. Kent State: 15. Toledo: 5. Ohio: 44. Miami (OH): 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 5 by 82.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 69.3. Murray State: 4 by 58.3. Georgia Southern: 9 by 48.1. Northern Illinois: 7 by 69.5. Central Michigan: 5 by 61.3. UConn: 2 by 40. Kent State: 2 by 50. Toledo: 1 by 33.3. Ohio: 5 by 58.7. Miami (OH): 3 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins36.2 · Games = 5 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · Games = 6 · +5.3 vs Wins