Player Stats

Andrew Peasley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,668
Passing yards
4,395
Rushing yards
1,273
Touchdowns
49

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonUtah State3951976019
2019 Regular SeasonUtah State188583149.9
2020 Regular SeasonUtah State5586391195533.4
2021 Regular SeasonUtah State9576415161432.5
2022 PostseasonWyoming121951869162.6
2022 Regular SeasonWyoming121,7181,3883301162.6
2023 PostseasonWyoming1218416816075.5
2023 Regular SeasonWyoming122,2261,8234032775.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Wyoming paired 2,410 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 63.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Wyoming.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Air Force

Loss with 260 yards of offense and 66.9 efficiency. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Wyoming

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

200.8

Efficiency

63.3

Usage

25.9

Consistency

81.1

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 184. Texas Tech: 217. Portland State: 244. App State: 16. New Mexico: 228. Fresno State: 208. Air Force: 260. Boise State: 68. Colorado State: 189. UNLV: 213. Hawai'i: 322. Nevada: 261

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 34 by 63.4. Texas Tech: 49 by 58.7. Portland State: 22 by 78.9. App State: 21 by 31. New Mexico: 32 by 69.3. Fresno State: 31 by 72.3. Air Force: 38 by 66.9. Boise State: 29 by 41.4. Colorado State: 33 by 61.9. UNLV: 36 by 58.9. Hawai'i: 24 by 71.7. Nevada: 27 by 85.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins207.7 · Games = 9 · +27.3 vs Losses
Losses180.3 · Games = 3 · -27.3 vs Wins