Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2018-2022Old Dominion
Elijah Davis
RB • 5'10" • 209 lbs • Lynchburg, VA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Elijah Davis leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Efficiency
48.1
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Old Dominion
1819212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Old Dominion
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Elijah Davis, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Old Dominion. Elijah Davis leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Old Dominion paired 603 primary output with 48.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Old Dominion
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
46.4
Efficiency
48.1
Usage
15.1
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 3. Wake Forest: 72. Unknown: 109. Liberty: 61. Buffalo: 20. UTEP: 24. Marshall: -1. Western Kentucky: 53. Louisiana Tech: 67. Florida International: 114. Florida Atlantic: 14. Middle Tennessee: 49. Charlotte: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 3 by 7.3. Wake Forest: 13 by 59. Unknown: 8 by 100. Liberty: 13 by 51.9. Buffalo: 9 by 23.1. UTEP: 5 by 50. Marshall: 6 by 0. Western Kentucky: 10 by 55.2. Louisiana Tech: 14 by 45.5. Florida International: 10 by 97.5. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 14.6. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 9 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins52.4 · n=5 · +19.3 vs Losses
Losses33.1 · n=7 · -19.3 vs Wins
First Half41.1 · n=7 · -11.4 vs Second Half
Second Half52.5 · n=6 · +11.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/20 | @ Tulsa | L 17-30 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 56-34 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 24-17 | 3 | 49 | 16.30 | 1 | — | — | 16.3 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 30-16 | 10 | 14 | 1.40 | 0 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Florida International100 rush yards | W 47-24 | 10 | 114 | 11.40 | 1 | — | — | 11.4 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 23-20 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Western Kentucky | L 20-43 | 10 | 53 | 5.30 | 1 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Marshall | L 13-20 | 5 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -0.2 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ UTEP | L 21-28 | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Buffalo | L 34-35 | 9 | 20 | 2.20 | 0 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Liberty | L 17-45 | 11 | 57 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 8 | 109 | 13.60 | 1 | — | — | 13.6 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Wake Forest | L 10-42 | 12 | 69 | 5.80 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Old Dominion
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 131 | 41 | 16.4 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 338 | 39.4 | 14.4 | 207 |
| 2021 Postseason | Old Dominion | 603 | 48.1 | 15.1 | 265 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 603 | 48.1 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 0 | — | — | -603 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114
Primary metric
114 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#2
Unknown
109
Primary metric
Game with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 11.6 usage.
#3
Virginia Tech
81
Primary metric
Loss with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 18.6 usage.
#4
Charlotte
63
Primary metric
Loss with 63 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
63 scrimmage yards and 21.7 usage.
#5
Florida International
58
Primary metric
Loss with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
58 scrimmage yards and 13.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Old Dominion
603 primary output · 48.1 efficiency · 15.1 usage
55.2
#2
2021 Regular Season · Old Dominion
55.2
603 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 15.1 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Old Dominion
34.7
338 primary · 39.4 efficiency · 14.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8299
Heritage · Lynchburg, VA
- Committed To
- Old Dominion
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,072
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.