Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2018-2023Wisconsin
Reggie Pearson
DB • 5'10" • 198 lbs • Inkster, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Reggie Pearson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
16.8
Consistency
31.8
Season Value
15.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Wisconsin
181919202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Wisconsin • Texas Tech • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reggie Pearson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Reggie Pearson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 1 primary output with 30.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 16.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wisconsin, Texas Tech, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
16.8
Usage
5.6
Consistency
31.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. Arkansas State: 1. Tulsa: 0.5. Iowa State: 1. Texas: 0. UCF: 0. Kansas: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. West Virginia: 1. TCU: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas State: 2 by 18.3. Tulsa: 5 by 25.8. Iowa State: 4 by 26.7. Texas: 2 by 8.3. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma State: 3 by 12.5. West Virginia: 1 by 14.2. TCU: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=7 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=5 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs TCU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Arizona | L 24-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs TCU | W 69-45 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs West Virginia | W 59-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kansas | L 33-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCF | W 31-29 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas | W 34-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Iowa State | W 50-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Tulsa | W 66-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Arkansas State | W 73-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2021-2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Oklahoma
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1 | 30.8 | 8 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Wisconsin | 7.5 | 25 | 5.7 | 6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 7.5 | 25 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | -7.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Texas Tech | 6 | 25.9 | 5.2 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 6 | 25.9 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 7 | 25.3 | 5.9 | 1 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 5.5 | 16.8 | 5.6 | -1.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 5.5 | 16.8 | 5.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.5 takeover score.
#2
TCU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#5
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Wisconsin
1 primary output · 30.8 efficiency · 8 usage
35.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · Texas Tech
22.2
7 primary · 25.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
15.9
5.5 primary · 16.8 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8675
River Rouge · River Rouge, MI
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
202
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.