Player Stats

Artur Sitkowski College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
2,804
Passing yards
2,826
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonRutgers111,0911,157-66445
2019 Regular SeasonRutgers3422429-7137
2020 Regular SeasonRutgers44354332349.6
2021 Regular SeasonIllinois573570431653.7
2022 Regular SeasonIllinois312110318030.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Illinois paired 735 primary output with 52.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 65.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Illinois.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa

Win with 89 yards of offense and 54.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Illinois

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

40.3

Efficiency

65.2

Usage

5.8

Consistency

34.6

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 23. Chattanooga: 9. Iowa: 89

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 3 by 88. Chattanooga: 4 by 53.3. Iowa: 23 by 54.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half16 · Games = 2 · -73 vs Second Half
Second Half89 · Games = 1 · +73 vs First Half