Player Stats

Eddie Lewis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,287
Receptions
102
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonRutgers923167049.1
2019 Regular SeasonRutgers3636142.7
2020 Regular SeasonRutgers0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonMemphis922349453.5
2022 PostseasonMemphis13583273.4
2022 Regular SeasonMemphis1337532773.4
2023 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina49120039.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Memphis paired 615 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 75.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Memphis, South Carolina.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Furman

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · South Carolina

Games

4

Receiving Yards / G

30

Efficiency

75.2

Usage

11.5

Consistency

25.6

Best Game by takeover score

Furman

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Furman: 89. Georgia: 23. Mississippi State: 8. Missouri: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Furman: 6 by 98.9. Georgia: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 2 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.5 · Games = 2 · +37 vs Losses
Losses11.5 · Games = 2 · -37 vs Wins