Usage Score
19.3
Player Profile
Amad Anderson Jr.
WR • 5'11" • 165 lbs • Staten Island, NY, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Amad Anderson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.7
Consistency
61
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue
181920212223
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Purdue
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Amad Anderson Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue. Amad Anderson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Temple.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Temple
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
64.7
Efficiency
85.7
Usage
19.3
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 65. Rutgers: 36. Unknown: 79. Miami: 117. Tulsa: 75. North Texas: 22. SMU: 3. Navy: 81. South Florida: 0. Memphis: 169
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 4 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. Miami: 10 by 78. Tulsa: 4 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 73.3. SMU: 1 by 20. Navy: 2 by 100. Memphis: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins73 · n=2 · +12.7 vs Losses
Losses60.3 · n=7 · -12.7 vs Wins
First Half74.4 · n=5 · +19.4 vs Second Half
Second Half55 · n=5 · -19.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 21-45 | — | 7 | 169 | 24.1 | 24.10 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ South Florida | L 23-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Navy | W 32-18 | — | 2 | 81 | 40.5 | 40.50 | 0 | 74 |
| Fri 10/20 | vs SMU | L 0-55 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 9/28 | @ Tulsa | L 26-48 | — | 4 | 75 | 14 | 18.80 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | L 7-41 | — | 10 | 117 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 79 | 13 | 15.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Rutgers | L 7-36 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Akron | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Temple
2021-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 343 | 74.7 | 10.9 | 343 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 19 | 26.7 | 5.7 | -324 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Temple | 283 | 58.8 | 15.5 | 264 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Temple | 479 | 71.1 | 16.6 | 196 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Temple | 647 | 85.7 | 19.3 | 168 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
169
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Temple
66.5
647 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 19.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Temple
51.1
479 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8809
Curtis · Staten Island, NY
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,771
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.