Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2018-2019Penn State
Micah Parsons
LB • 6'3" • 245 lbs • Harrisburg, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Micah Parsons shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 50.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
50.6
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
34.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Penn State
18181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Micah Parsons, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Penn State. Micah Parsons shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 50.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Penn State paired 24 primary output with 50.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 50.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
50.6
Usage
11.5
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 7. Unknown: 0. Buffalo: 2. Pittsburgh: 3. Maryland: 0. Purdue: 3. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 1. Minnesota: 3. Indiana: 1. Ohio State: 2. Rutgers: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 14 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 10 by 61.7. Pittsburgh: 9 by 67.5. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Purdue: 5 by 50.8. Iowa: 4 by 16.7. Michigan: 14 by 50. Michigan State: 12 by 60. Minnesota: 11 by 75.8. Indiana: 7 by 39.2. Ohio State: 10 by 61.7. Rutgers: 10 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=10 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses2.5 · n=2 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half2.1 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · n=6 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Memphis10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | W 53-39 | 14 | 7 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rutgers10+ tackles | W 27-6 | 10 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ohio State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 17-28 | 10 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Indiana | W 34-27 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Minnesota10+ tackles · Splash game | L 26-31 | 11 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan State10+ tackles | W 28-7 | 12 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Michigan10+ tackles | W 28-21 | 14 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Iowa | W 17-12 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs PurdueSplash game | W 35-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Maryland | W 59-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs PittsburghSplash game | W 17-10 | 9 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Buffalo10+ tackles · Splash game | W 45-13 | 10 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2018-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 6.5 | 31 | 6.5 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 6.5 | 31 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Penn State | 24 | 50.6 | 11.5 | 17.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 24 | 50.6 | 11.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 75.2 takeover score.
#2
Rutgers
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#3
Minnesota
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#4
Pittsburgh
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#5
Rutgers
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Penn State
24 primary output · 50.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
34.6
#2
2019 Regular Season · Penn State
34.6
24 primary · 50.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Penn State
14.3
6.5 primary · 31 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
8
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9982
Harrisburg · Harrisburg, PA
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
192
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.