Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2018-2020Penn State
TE • 6'5" • 258 lbs • Merrimac, MA, USA
Pat Freiermuth reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.5
Efficiency
89.3
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
63
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Pat Freiermuth, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Penn State. Pat Freiermuth reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Penn State paired 310 primary output with 89.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 89.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
77.5
Efficiency
89.3
Usage
26.5
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 60. Ohio State: 46. Maryland: 91. Nebraska: 113
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 7 by 57.1. Ohio State: 3 by 100. Maryland: 6 by 100. Nebraska: 7 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nebraska
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 368 | 83.4 | 14.3 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 368 | 83.4 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Penn State | 507 | 75.7 | 20.4 | 139 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 507 | 75.7 | 20.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Penn State | 310 | 89.3 | 26.5 | -197 |
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Penn State
310 primary output · 89.3 efficiency · 26.5 usage
63
#2
2018 Postseason · Penn State
62.8
368 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Penn State
62.8
368 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 14.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9149
Brooks School · North Andover, MA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,185
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Pat Freiermuth quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit