Usage Score
9.7
Player Dossier
2019-2023Toledo
DT • 6'4" • 293 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Judge Culpepper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.7
Efficiency
27.5
Consistency
35
Season Value
28.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Judge Culpepper, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Toledo. Judge Culpepper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.5 disruption score.
Judge Culpepper played DT for Penn State and Toledo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Judge Culpepper recorded 1 rushing yards and 132 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Toledo paired 19.5 primary output with 27.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 27.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Toledo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
27.5
Usage
9.7
Consistency
35
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Illinois: 0. Unknown: 4. San José State: 4. Western Michigan: 1. Northern Illinois: 1.5. Massachusetts: 1. Ball State: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Buffalo: 0. Bowling Green: 2. Central Michigan: 5. Miami (OH): 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 4 by 56.7. San José State: 3 by 52.5. Western Michigan: 4 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 35.8. Massachusetts: 1 by 14.2. Ball State: 4 by 16.7. Miami (OH): 3 by 12.5. Buffalo: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 2 by 28.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 70.8. Miami (OH): 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Wyoming | L 15-16 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Miami (OH) | L 14-23 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Central Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | W 32-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Bowling Green | W 32-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Tue 10/31 | vs Buffalo | W 31-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Miami (OH) | W 21-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Ball State | W 13-6 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Massachusetts | W 41-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Northern Illinois | W 35-33 | 5 | 0 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-31 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs San José State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Illinois | L 28-30 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2019-2020
Opening stop
Toledo
2021-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 1 | 9.2 | 3.4 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Penn State | 1 | 8.8 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 8 | 23.2 | 5.9 | 7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 4.5 | 20.4 | 4.7 | -3.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 19.5 | 27.5 | 9.7 | 15 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 19.5 | 27.5 | 9.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.2 takeover score.
#2
Kent State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.4 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
San José State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#5
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Toledo
19.5 primary output · 27.5 efficiency · 9.7 usage
28.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · Toledo
28.9
19.5 primary · 27.5 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Penn State
16.2
1 primary · 9.2 efficiency · 3.4 usage
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8871
Plant · Tampa, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.