Player Dossier

2018-2021

Ohio State

Chris Olave

WR • 6'1" • 188 lbs • San Marcos, CA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Chris Olave reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

21.8

Efficiency

81.2

Consistency

71.4

Season Value

68.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Ohio State

181919202021

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Ohio State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Chris Olave, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Ohio State. Chris Olave reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Chris Olave played WR for Ohio State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Olave recorded 5 rushing yards, 2,711 receiving yards, and 11 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Ohio State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Ohio State paired 729 primary output with 88.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Ohio State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

85.1

Efficiency

81.2

Usage

21.8

Consistency

71.4

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 117. Oregon: 126. Akron: 12. Rutgers: 119. Maryland: 120. Indiana: 24. Penn State: 44. Nebraska: 61. Purdue: 85. Michigan State: 140. Michigan: 88

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 4 by 100. Oregon: 12 by 70. Akron: 2 by 40. Rutgers: 5 by 100. Maryland: 7 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 80. Penn State: 3 by 97.8. Nebraska: 7 by 58.1. Purdue: 9 by 63. Michigan State: 7 by 100. Michigan: 7 by 83.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins80.2 · Games = 9 · -26.8 vs Losses
Losses107 · Games = 2 · +26.8 vs Wins
First Half86.3 · Games = 6 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half83.6 · Games = 5 · -2.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Michigan State

Best efficiency game

100 vs Michigan State

Result
Sat 11/27@ MichiganL 27-4278812.612.60039
Sat 11/20vs Michigan State100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 56-771402020243
Sat 11/13vs PurdueHigh volumeW 59-319859.49.40113
Sat 11/6@ NebraskaW 26-177618.78.70116
Sat 10/30vs Penn StateW 33-2434414.714.70138
Sat 10/23@ IndianaW 54-72241212116
Sat 10/9vs Maryland100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 66-17712017.117.10236
Sat 10/2@ Rutgers100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 52-13511923.823.80256
Sat 9/25vs AkronW 59-72126617
Sat 9/11vs Oregon100 receiving yards · High volumeL 28-351212610.510.50041
Fri 9/3@ Minnesota100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 45-31411729.329.30261

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Ohio State

    2018-2021

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201820192019202020202021
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2018 Regular SeasonOhio State19782.27.3
2019 PostseasonOhio State84988.520.8652
2019 Regular SeasonOhio State84988.520.80
2020 PostseasonOhio State72988.536.2-120
2020 Regular SeasonOhio State72988.536.20
2021 Regular SeasonOhio State93681.221.8207

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Michigan State

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

139

Primary metric

139 receiving yards with a 92.7 efficiency score.

#2

Clemson

132

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Michigan State

140

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Rutgers

139

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Minnesota

117

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2020 Postseason · Ohio State

729 primary output · 88.5 efficiency · 36.2 usage

70.7

#2

2020 Regular Season · Ohio State

70.7

729 primary · 88.5 efficiency · 36.2 usage

#3

2021 Regular Season · Ohio State

68.1

936 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 21.8 usage

Milestones

11

100+ receiving yards

5

8+ catch outings

11

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2018 · Rating 0.8875

Mission Hills · San Marcos, CA

Committed To
Ohio State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2018

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

2,711

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.