Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2018-2023Ohio State
Jaelen Gill
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Westerville, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jaelen Gill reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.2
Consistency
42.2
Season Value
54.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Fresno State
18192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Ohio State • Boston College • Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaelen Gill, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Fresno State. Jaelen Gill reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Fresno State paired 525 primary output with 63.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Boston College, Fresno State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
40.4
Efficiency
63.2
Usage
14.3
Consistency
42.2
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 69. Purdue: 65. Unknown: 40. Arizona State: 72. Kent State: 28. Nevada: 126. Wyoming: 24. Utah State: 19. UNLV: 3. Boise State: 24. San José State: 29. New Mexico: 18. San Diego State: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 5 by 92. Purdue: 8 by 54.2. Unknown: 3 by 88.9. Arizona State: 6 by 80. Kent State: 3 by 62.2. Nevada: 8 by 100. Wyoming: 4 by 40. Utah State: 2 by 63.3. UNLV: 2 by 10. Boise State: 3 by 53.3. San José State: 3 by 64.4. New Mexico: 2 by 60. San Diego State: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins50.8 · n=8 · +31 vs Losses
Losses19.8 · n=4 · -31 vs Wins
First Half60.6 · n=7 · +43.7 vs Second Half
Second Half16.8 · n=6 · -43.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/16 | vs New Mexico State | W 37-10 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ San Diego State | L 18-33 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs New Mexico | L 17-25 | — | 2 | 18 | 5.3 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ San José State | L 18-42 | — | 3 | 29 | 8.8 | 9.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Boise State | W 37-30 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs UNLV | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Utah State | W 37-32 | — | 2 | 19 | 6.7 | 9.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Wyoming | L 19-24 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Nevada100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-9 | — | 8 | 126 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 2 | 65 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Kent State | W 53-10 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Arizona State | W 29-0 | — | 6 | 72 | 10.1 | 12 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 40 | 6.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ PurdueHigh volume | W 39-35 | — | 8 | 65 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2018-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Boston College
2020-2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Fresno State
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 11 | 73.3 | 3.2 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 51 | 45 | 7.8 | 40 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Boston College | 435 | 72.3 | 12.2 | 384 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Boston College | 269 | 69.5 | 20.7 | -166 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boston College | 388 | 73.2 | 10.8 | 119 |
| 2023 Postseason | Fresno State | 525 | 63.2 | 14.3 | 137 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Fresno State | 525 | 63.2 | 14.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
NC State
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Fresno State
525 primary output · 63.2 efficiency · 14.3 usage
54.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Fresno State
54.3
525 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Boston College
51.5
435 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 12.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9831
Westerville South · Westerville, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,679
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.