Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023Auburn
Asa Martin
RB • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Courtland, AL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Asa Martin leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
51.7
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
36.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Memphis
1820202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Auburn • Memphis • Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Asa Martin, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Memphis. Asa Martin leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Memphis paired 747 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, Memphis, Troy.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Loss with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Troy
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
15.1
Efficiency
51.7
Usage
5.2
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 27. Unknown: 20. Kansas State: 7. James Madison: 6. Western Kentucky: 6. Arkansas State: 38. Army: 24. Texas State: 0. South Alabama: 3. UL Monroe: 18. Louisiana: 7. Southern Miss: 23. App State: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 3 by 87.5. Unknown: 4 by 66.7. Kansas State: 3 by 24.3. James Madison: 1 by 50. Western Kentucky: 2 by 31.3. Arkansas State: 5 by 52.5. Army: 6 by 41.7. South Alabama: 1 by 31.3. UL Monroe: 4 by 31.3. Louisiana: 1 by 72.9. Southern Miss: 3 by 63.2. App State: 3 by 67.4
Split Comparison
Wins15.1 · n=9 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses13.3 · n=3 · -1.8 vs Wins
First Half18.3 · n=7 · +7.0 vs Second Half
Second Half11.3 · n=6 · -7.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | @ Duke | L 10-17 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 9 |
| Sat 12/2 | vs App State | W 49-23 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Southern Miss | W 35-17 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7.7 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana | W 31-24 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | — | — | 7 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ UL Monroe | W 45-14 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 4.5 |
| Thu 11/2 | vs South Alabama | W 28-10 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Texas State | W 31-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Army | W 19-0 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Arkansas State | W 37-3 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 7.6 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Western Kentucky | W 27-24 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs James Madison | L 14-16 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Kansas State | L 13-42 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 22 | 7.30 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2018
Opening stop
- 2
Memphis
2020-2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Troy
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20182020202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Auburn | 93 | 47.7 | 4.5 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Memphis | 338 | 48.1 | 13.6 | 245 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Memphis | 338 | 48.1 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Memphis | 258 | 29.4 | 9.3 | -80 |
| 2022 Postseason | Memphis | 747 | 59.9 | 16.9 | 489 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Memphis | 747 | 59.9 | 16.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Troy | 196 | 51.7 | 5.2 | -551 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Troy | 196 | 51.7 | 5.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109
Primary metric
109 scrimmage yards and 29.8 usage.
#2
SMU
110
Primary metric
Loss with 110 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
110 scrimmage yards and 26.7 usage.
#3
LSU
33
Primary metric
Loss with 33 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
33 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
#4
Mississippi State
78
Primary metric
Loss with 78 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
78 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#5
East Carolina
72
Primary metric
Loss with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 15 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Memphis
747 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 16.9 usage
64
#2
2022 Regular Season · Memphis
64
747 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 16.9 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Memphis
41.5
338 primary · 48.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9207
Austin · Decatur, AL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,632
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.